Regulatory position: ESPR framework in force; product-specific measures continue to develop.View status

Free · no email gate

Check your Digital Product Passport readiness.

Review product data, supplier visibility, traceability, evidence, systems and governance using a transparent 30-question diagnostic.

30Questions6Dimensions~12Minutes0Email gates
DPP Readiness AssessmentModel v1.0
Recommended preparation

Measure operational readiness—not legal compliance.

This guided diagnostic examines whether the practical foundations for DPP preparation are present across a clearly defined organisational and product scope.

TransparentPublished response weights, thresholds and guardrails.
DeterministicNo AI changes your score, classification or gap priority.
ActionableEvery identified gap maps to measurable completion evidence.
A score can be calculated in this browser without an account. Choosing Continue in DPPLogic attaches those answers to a local-test workspace handoff. No email is required to see the result.

The DPP Readiness Assessment is a diagnostic tool and does not constitute legal certification or regulatory approval.

Methodology v1.0

A conservative, deterministic readiness model.

The scoring model measures self-reported operational capability. It deliberately avoids product-specific legal assumptions and never converts a score into certification.

Response weights

Every question has equal weight. “Not sure” earns no readiness credit because an unverified capability cannot substantiate readiness; it remains distinct from “No” in recommendations.

ResponsePointsScore value
Yes4100%
Mostly375%
Partially250%
No00%
Not sure00% + uncertainty flag
Classification guardrails

Advanced requires at least 85 overall, at least 70 in every category, no “Not sure” responses and every foundational question at “Mostly” or “Yes”. Established requires at least 70 overall and 50 in every category. Developing requires at least 50 overall and 25 in every category. Seven or more “Not sure” responses produce “Insufficient evidence” regardless of the numerical score.

Gap prioritisation

Gaps are ranked by response severity, foundational status, weakest category and stable question ID. One gap is first selected from each affected category, then any remaining places are filled from the global ranking. AI does not alter this order.

Known limitations

This is a self-reported diagnostic, not an independently evidenced audit. Equal weighting and thresholds are transparent policy choices, not empirically validated predictors of compliance. Sector-specific requirements and legal applicability must be verified separately using current authoritative sources.